Thank you for not assuming the reader already knows everything, the explanations meet me where I am, and a look at ulviroline did the same, that consideration is what makes a site feel welcoming rather than gatekeepy which is sadly the default mood across the modern web today for most subjects covered.
Appreciated how the writer anticipated the questions a reader might have along the way, and a stop at nolarobond continued that thoughtful approach, you can tell when content has been edited with the reader in mind versus just published as a first draft and this is clearly the former approach across what I read.
OK — been using this thing for something like four months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d say something since a mate asked me a few days back. Am based in the UK, mostly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.
How I found it was honestly embarrassing — I couldn’t ever work out what an ew return would be with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just eyeball it and get a shock. Now I type the odds in first, every time, even the boring singles.
The single bet calculator tool is the one I open most — you put in your stake, the odds and it spits out returns straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, and that’s where most people I know lose track. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here matched betting calculator excel and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
The thing that really shifted things for me were the more serious tools. They’ve got an implied probability thing which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one gets used a fair bit when I’m splitting a race.
Not all sunshine though. Its design looks very functional, let’s say — zero flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works though the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And nothing on the app store, just the site — slight shame but worth saying.
So yeah. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does the job. Anyone who even now does the maths on paper, try it — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.
Now planning a longer reading session for the archives, and a stop at zylavocapital confirmed the archives are worth that longer commitment, sites with archives I want to read deliberately rather than just sample are rare and this one has clearly earned that level of interest based on the consistency of what I have already read.
The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at ThirtyMale kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.
Thank you for not assuming the reader already knows everything, the explanations meet me where I am, and a look at ulviroline did the same, that consideration is what makes a site feel welcoming rather than gatekeepy which is sadly the default mood across the modern web today for most subjects covered.
Appreciated how the writer anticipated the questions a reader might have along the way, and a stop at nolarobond continued that thoughtful approach, you can tell when content has been edited with the reader in mind versus just published as a first draft and this is clearly the former approach across what I read.
OK — been using this thing for something like four months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d say something since a mate asked me a few days back. Am based in the UK, mostly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.
How I found it was honestly embarrassing — I couldn’t ever work out what an ew return would be with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just eyeball it and get a shock. Now I type the odds in first, every time, even the boring singles.
The single bet calculator tool is the one I open most — you put in your stake, the odds and it spits out returns straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, and that’s where most people I know lose track. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here matched betting calculator excel and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
The thing that really shifted things for me were the more serious tools. They’ve got an implied probability thing which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one gets used a fair bit when I’m splitting a race.
Not all sunshine though. Its design looks very functional, let’s say — zero flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works though the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And nothing on the app store, just the site — slight shame but worth saying.
So yeah. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does the job. Anyone who even now does the maths on paper, try it — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.
Now planning a longer reading session for the archives, and a stop at zylavocapital confirmed the archives are worth that longer commitment, sites with archives I want to read deliberately rather than just sample are rare and this one has clearly earned that level of interest based on the consistency of what I have already read.
The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at ThirtyMale kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.